I was talking on my Facebook about some difficulties I was having
writing out my life philosophy. I work on creating new societies,
and I'd like to be able to succinctly share my own thoughts on my
orientation towards life.
Someone I know and like responded with, "That's why I've decided to
more or less stop writing and do more living. How deeply can I touch
this moment? Not that writing doesn't sometimes help to touch a
moment more deeply."
-and my thought was: "Ah, now, there's a familiar argument..."
Because -- just three days ago, on Saturday, at the Easter party at
my mom and dad's place, I was talking with a family friend. (Names
omitted because I haven't asked permission to use them.) She was
telling me that she was reading Eckhart Tolle, and connecting with
the present moment.
But it's more than that -- most everybody I know who is spiritually
minded, is talking this way -- whether they are near or far.
Philosophies are like giant ships, gigantic structures floating
through histories. They are shaped by historical forces. When
everybody (or at least, a lot of people) are thinking similarly,
there's a reason, a story behind it.
So what is this philosophy that people keep telling me?
Now I need to make a cautionary note -- I don't know the person very
well, who said the things that triggered this blog post. Perhaps I
am way off, in this individual's case. But I don't think that I am
far off in the general case. So, MB or KW, if I get what you meant
way off -- please forgive me, and I welcome your correction. But I
think you will be able to recognize the general case story that I am
talking about, and I think it's very likely that you'll be able to
substantially identify with it, too.
So what's this philosophy?
Here I think are some of the core ideological points. I don't think
the ideology sees itself as an ideology -- it's in the category of
ideologies that are anti-ideological; And yet, whoah, when you look
at it, familiar patterns emerge in the motions of thought. I argue
that it *is* an ideology.
Point: "Life has no meaning."
The argument goes that meanings are the products of abstractions
which are inclined to become increasingly unreal. Some people put
the boundary of this at mainly human knowledge ("What's a good way
of organizing my closet? What's a good way of organizing a
society?"), and some people extend it to the cosmic ("The universe
is play; Our lives are the universe at play. The universe is
playing hide & seek with itself.")
There is no right way, and "right ways" are the products of
controllers, the overly serious, the patriarchs, the law makers,
wanna-be Moses', etc.,. Anyone who talks about a meaning is
basically assigning you a job, and thus having YOU live out what is
in fact THEIR drama, making you a slave.
So: This being the frame of the world, what do we do?
Here the aim is to get past the abstractions which just confound
human beings, so what we do is focus on the sensations of the
present moment. We put a stop to the mind, to thoughts, which run
incessantly like a crazy wind-up toy.
So: This being the frame of the world, how do we communicate?
Because nothing has any meaning, we focus on the sounds of the
words, rather than their meanings. Non-verbal communicate and
peace-communication becomes essential. Focus goes to the muscular
and emotiona motions behind words. We listen for the anger, or we
hear the desire, or we hear the warmth, or we hear the coldness.
"That's where the real value lives."
Because if you focus on the "semantic meaning" of the words, you're
going to miss it. All the action is going on underneath the
semantics. If you're "in the moment" (which is the enlightenment
state of this ideology,) then you're going to get all that rich
juicy underneath stuff.
Practices approved by this line of thought:
* sitting meditation
* listening, "really listening," to people
* going hiking
* listening to waves
* and (of course:) "being in the moment
Appreciations:
* Buddhism -- "religion without the 'stuff'"
* Taoism -- (the same)
* stillness
* the aesthetic of "emptiness"
* veneration of relaxation, middle-class life, and compassion
* games & play; layla
* did I mention stillness?
Affinities:
* circular (cyclical) views of the world
* anthropology
* nature
Aversions:
* interpretation
* grand narratives
* business
* activity
Entering the philosophy: Alan Watts
Inside the philosophy: Eckhart Tolle (The Power of Now, a New Earth)
Exiting the philosophy: The Landmark Forum (still in it, though)
Okay. I've explicated the philosophy. Everyone know what I'm
talking about, kinda? It's a huge thing and many words written
about it. I think I've pointed at it enough, though, so that
someone who is "in the scene" or alive in spirituality/spiritual
communities/the New Age/Metaphysical/philosophical bookstore at this
time should be able to recognize it, though.
I'm at the 28 minute mark, and I meant to write for only 30 minutes.
I'm going to give myself another 15 minutes before I head down to
get a burrito.
Maybe I'll write another post tomorrow to continue. Anyways, here
really fast is 15 minutes of an alternative to the philosophy, and
maybe some problems with the philosophy.
Well, I'll just say what I want to say. It probably won't make
sense, but maybe you can piece together clues. If there is
interest, I'll formulate something stronger and I'll definitely
answer any questions.
MEANING.
Meaning may not exist in any sort of "hanging out in space" absolute
sense, but meaning exactly and ALWAYS exists inside the human brain.
Look at the absurdity of this -- too. I mean, there's a part of
these people where they get upset if you say, "No, there is
meaning." Because they're actively trying to stamp out any and all
sense of meaning ("within reason, dear fellow, within reason") from
their minds.
What they are missing is that the universe is alive inside of them
and that it is perceiving meaning. Where is that meaning? It's not
hiding out there in space; It's the universe's exploration of its
interior.
And -- it's not just a game. A game is by definition something that
doesn't mean in reality. It's "pretend." But the proper motion for
pretend is to be an exploration of the real.
The Real -- "reality" -- that's something very scary for most
people.
A lot of times, the people in these philosophies have made turtles
of themselves. And yes, they absolutely are involved in compassion
and making the world a better place. Absolutely. These are
wonderful lovely people.
But often, those who have not found a core "something larger than
myself" that they are participating in -- or in moments of
(necessary!) confusion -- go back to "well, nothing means anything,
so it doesn't matter, and I don't matter, and that doesn't depress
me becomes nothing matters, ..."
Oh dear.
What I mean is that there is a part of these people that sees that
things do matter, and then they try to stamp that out, jump up and
down on it, make that thought go away by strategies of misdirection,
affirmation ("nothing means anything, nothing means anything,
nothing means anything,") and "I just need to meditate harder,
longer, and I will be in bliss and peace." Many call it "the work"
or "practice" or "daily practice" and on and on. Enormous volumes
of time go into this "most important" work of elminating all sense
of importance.
I've read your books; Don't hide. And I'm not your enemy.
What about those people who are doing the good works? Who are
working as part of something larger than themselves? But look:
There is meaning. It's right there. That's exactly where it is.
...
Hang with me. I'm collecting my energy; Revisiting the arguments in
my mind. I'm speaking from the perspective of the perspective I've
gone past, and I think, really, I should speak from the perspective
I'm at, and that I want you to come *too.*
...
The world is rich and alive. It's also Real. Meaning is real,
consequence is real, but that doesn't mean that we are slaves to
some remote disembodied God, or that someone is going to become your
Pharoh, telling you what you need to do. The reason is because the
connection with reality is within yourself. You can learn from
other people, but the divine structures within the heart are visible
for all to see.
Joseph Smith and his concept of the Theo-Democracy.
A saint is to be revered by his ability to help people to see, not
by his ability to organize people. When people who see organize
themselves, then something of value has been done, and the person
who was a seer is now one amongst many.
The world is rich and alive.
We are the Universe that is evolving. There is a meaningful dream,
a real draeam inside of us, that is striving to grow out. We, in
our genetic-mimetic-spiritual core, in our sex and ideals and hopes
and powers, are participants and occupants of the great dream.
The intellect is not our enemy. Perception is not our enemy.
Sensation is not our savior. Really, what we are after is a
liveliness. It is a dance, but it is a dance that is going
somewhere, too. Because war is not something we can dance to.
Those who feel the compulsion to think, we can apply our thoughts,
and we need to find our thoughts.
Are questions are of merit; They are not to be suppressed. They are
how the universe finds itself within the conscious plane.
Really what we are after is the cooperation and communication
between the conscious and unconscious elements. The limin was not
intended to be an escape.
I am not seeking a "balance" point; I am seeking life and vitality.
I know it in my body, and I know it in my thoughts. Emotion and
rational thought play clear and distinct parts in the dance. Now I
feel, now I think. Conclusions follow. They are of value. One
path was wrong, the other was right. I went the wrong way, but I
found the right one.
This is not oppression or oppressive; Only what is oppressive or
oppression will be oppressive or oppression. We'll feel it in our
heart, and communicate, to make sure we aren't oppressing one
another. But we'll also think and challenge our hearts at times,
too.
Desire and conscience are the guide. The destination is the Kingdom
of Heaven. Yes, this present moment is great, but it is also full
of horrors. The excuse that "my eye does not see war right now" --
"I am just looking at a computer monitor" -- is not a good one.
One of the errors (horrors?) of the "present moment" movement is
that it pretends not to see what it knows very well is going on.
Intellect and powers are the manifesting arm of the flow of the
spirit. The perceptual arm is absolutely worthless if it is not
flying with the intellect and powers as well. The same is true in
return.
Today: Some people will be thinkers and strategists and perceivers
and "psi" types. But in the future, everybody will be empowered,
without losing a smidgeon of who they are. This does not mean that
people are of lesser or higher value. The evolution is eternal and
spirals upward completely around the ever-present Love.
Okay. Times up.
Permalink
| Leave a comment »